Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
Izzet Prowess | marios tsopelas | 9-5 | None |
Izzet Prowess | shoji kimura | 9-3 | None |
Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Oculus
Iymrith, Desert Doom ranks #3980 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 78%).
Blue average: 50.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Iymrith, Desert Doom is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 4.14 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 48.1%. Iymrith, Desert Doom has a win rate of 69.0%, making it 43.5% better than other 5-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arcane Signet | Artifact | 5 | 74.1% | 1 |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 6 | 71.9% | 3 |
Negate | Instant | 7 | 71.7% | 3 |
Jwari Disruption | Instant | 6 | 65.3% | 2 |
Test of Talents | Instant | 6 | 62.1% | 2 |
Fateful Absence | Instant | 5 | 53.0% | 1 |
Memory Deluge | Instant | 6 | 51.4% | 1 |
Dragon's Fire | Instant | 8 | 51.2% | 0 |
Behold the Multiverse | Instant | 6 | 50.0% | 3 |
Saw It Coming | Instant | 8 | 45.2% | 3 |
Cards that perform better with Iymrith, Desert Doom than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Negate | Instant | 2 | 8 | 78.7% | 62.7% | +16.0% |
Saw It Coming | Instant | 3 | 8 | 80.0% | 64.1% | +15.9% |
Arcane Signet | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 76.7% | 63.4% | +13.3% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 8 | 73.5% | 62.9% | +10.6% |
Behold the Multiverse | Instant | 4 | 8 | 75.0% | 65.1% | +9.9% |
Power Word Kill | Instant | 2 | 6 | 72.7% | 65.4% | +7.3% |
Dragon's Fire | Instant | 2 | 7 | 71.1% | 64.0% | +7.0% |
Hullbreaker Horror | Creature — Kraken Horror | 7 | 5 | 66.7% | 64.0% | +2.7% |
Bloodchief's Thirst | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 64.7% | 66.2% | -1.5% |
Goldspan Dragon | Creature — Dragon | 5 | 6 | 62.5% | 64.0% | -1.5% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Prowess | 7 | 0.7% | 46.2% |
Dimir Midrange | 5 | 0.2% | 30.0% |
Azorius Omniscience | 3 | 0.5% | 35.6% |
Jeskai Oculus | 3 | 0.4% | 49.7% |
Esper Pixie | 3 | 0.2% | 40.3% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.